Donnabelle Gatdula
Philippine Star
The Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has ordered the state-run National Power Corp. (Napocor) to explain why it should not be penalized for reportedly withholding information regarding possible overcharging.
In a show cause order dated May 7, ERC told Napocor “to explain its failure to file its applications under the Generation Rate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) and the Incremental Currency Exchange Rate Adjustment (ICERA) for the period covering July 2006 to March 2008.”
ERC requires Napocor to respond within 15 days from the receipt of the order.
Based on ERC’s estimates, the over-recovery amounted to P10 billion, which entitles customers to a refund of 20 centavos per kilowatt-hour under the so-called deferred accounting adjustment (DAA).
“Napocor’s non-filing of its GRAM and ICERA applications is a violation of Section 5 of the implementing rules for both the GRAM and the ICERA,” ERC officer-in-charge Alejandro Barin said.
“The ERC hopes that the NPC will take expedient action on this matter to safeguard public interest,” he said.
Section 5 of the IRR for GRAM requires Napocor to file an application for deferred generation cost accounting for the calculation of the generation rate.
On the other hand, Section 5 of the IRR for ICERA requires Napocor to file a currency exchange accounting application for the calculation of ICERA.
GRAM is a mechanism that allows periodic adjustments in the generation rate to reflect changes in fuel and purchased power costs after a review by the ERC.
ICERA, on the other hand, factors in currency changes in rates setting after a review by the ERC.
“Rest assured that your ERC will remain vigilant in protecting the welfare and interests of electricity consumers,” Barin said.
In a statement, Napocor said it is “in the process of filing such application,” and that is just waiting for its board to approve the application.
Napocor said it is set to file its 9th GRAM covering the period July 2006 to December 2006 to effect a rate reduction in Luzon by P0.0133; Visayas, P0.0599; and Mindanao, P0.4007 per kWh. This is expected to result in an overall reduction of P0.1088 per kWh.
‘Irregular buying behavior’
Napocor blamed the Manila Electric Co..’s “irregular buying behavior” yesterday for the high cost of electricity in Metro Manila.
Dennis Gana, Napocor spokesman told reporters at the weekly Baliltaan sa Rembrandt Hotel in Quezon City that Meralco buys electricity from Napocor during peak hours, or about five pesos more expensive than during off peak hours.
“Because of irregular behavior of Meralco the public cannot avail of the so called Time Of Use (TOU)) because Meralco only buys electricity during peak hours,” he said.
Gana said that during off peak hours from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. Meralco gets its electric supply from independent power producers.
Gana said electricity costs only P1.80 per kWh during off-peak hours and P6 during peak periods.
He explained that even without being ordered by President Arroyo, Meralco can charge less based on the TOU rates approved by the ERC.
“It all depends on Meralco’s purchasing mix, since end consumers cannot directly avail of the NPC power TOU power rates. Meralco can optimize its benefits by adjusting the level of electricity it buys from various sources,” he said.
Gana said Meralco may improve its load pattern from Napocor by buying electricity also during off peak hours when rates are lower.
He said this is how electricity cooperatives in Luzon outside Meralco’s franchise areas are able to charge lower rates.
Gana also pointed out that the rate Meralco showed in its full-page ads includes the 30 centavos rate cut by Napocor under the Power Act Reduction of P 0.30.
“Meralco should have explained what time they buy power from each source, and how much, considering that (Napocor) is offering charging them on the ERC-approved TOU rates of only P 1.87 /kWh during off period and 6.06 /kWh during peak compared to their IPPs which
charge P 4.4744/kWh” Gana said. In its ads, Meralco explained its side against allegations of overcharging.
No gag on power execs
Senate President Manuel Villar Jr. urged President Arroyo yesterday to allow officials of the energy department, Napocor, and the National Transmission Corp. (TransCo) to attend the hearing called by the Joint Congressional Power Commission (JCPC) on high power rates.
“They should be present in the hearings called by the Senate. If they have not done anything wrong, then there should be no problem coming to the Senate and present their sides during the hearing,” Villar said.
Villar said energy officials led by Secretary Angelo Reyes should attend the hearing on Monday morning. Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago chairs the JCPC.
Also invited to attend the hearing are Napocor president Cyril del Callar, ERC chairman Rodolfo Albano Jr,, Meralco president Jesus Francisco and Government Service Insurance System president Winston Garcia.
The Palace and the Senate are locked in a battle over Executive Order 464 and over executive privilege. Mrs. Arroyo issued EO 464 to prevent officials from attending legislative hearings without her consent. She issued the EO at the height of the national broadband network scandal.
Militants dare govt on transparency
The militant Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) challenged the administration yesterday to prove its commitment to “transparency in governance” by fully disclosing its earnings from the value-added tax (VAT) on electricity rates.
Bayan, citing “industry sources,” said the government might have already collected some P36 billion from the generation, transmission, and distribution sectors of the power industry in just two years.
“There is an ongoing debate on why power rates are high. Apart from the policies of deregulation and privatization, we have also maintained that the VAT contributes significantly to these high power rates,” Bayan secretary- general Renato Reyes Jr. said.
“Industry sources have informed us that the Arroyo government was able to collect more than P30 billion in VAT on generation and transmission from 2006-2007,” he said.
“Other sources have informed us that the Arroyo government may have collected more than P6 billion in VAT on distribution charges from Meralco service areas,” he said.
“These are huge amounts collected only in a span of two years. We challenge government, in the spirit of transparency, to disclose to the public how much VAT it is collecting from power rates,” Reyes said.
Bayan said generation and transmission charges are “pass through” charges so the VAT rates on these items are not computed at exactly 12 percent. The VAT on the distribution charge, however, is computed at 12 percent of all items under distribution. Meanwhile, the generation, transmission, and distribution rates are computed based on kilowatt per hour consumption.
“Another way of looking at it, take away the VAT and you will probably lower power rates by P1.41/kWh,” Reyes noted.
Citing a study made by consumer group People Opposed to Warrantless Electricity Rates (POWER), Bayan said that eliminating the VAT on power will save electricity users consuming 200 kWh/month around P206; while those consuming 300 kWh/month can save more than P470.
“The savings from VAT will help families cope with the rising cost of living. It’s not true that they will tend to consume more electricity. They will in fact use the savings to buy food and other basic necessities,” Reyes said.
“If government is really serious in bringing down power rates, it can start with the VAT on power. That would be a fast and direct way of lowering rates,” he said.
- With Christina Mendez and Perseus Echeminada